Why Owner.One
My data is set and organized, why would I need a Repository of Assets Data and Wealth Transit?
Today
Your family is fully dependent on you, as they know nothing about your assets
Tomorrow
Your family’s access to your assets depends on the system you've set up - or on third parties deciding for them
Owner.One Comparison Chart
Self-management by capital founder (paper documents, Google Drive, etc.)
Management by 3rd party (lawyers, family offices, trusts, proxies, etc.)
Well-structured data storage
Access control
Data update reminders
Data transfer at the owner's request
Dependent on third-party decision
Data encryption and protection
Dependent on third parties
End-to-end encryption
Transparent for the owner
Fully autonomous from third parties
Flexible management
Secured price
High additional fees and commissions
Immediate data transfer just-in-time
Dependent on third-party speed
Data transfers triggered by algorithms
No Delays or Time Risks
High risk of delays and errors
Dependent on third parties
Eliminated by automation
Resume
Delegating ≠ Solution
Delegating the problem of capital transfer to 3rd party professionals does not guarantee its successful execution. Only your family will be able to evaluate the efficiency, when the time comes
Superficial knowledge about assets
You are referring to the presented reports, not the original data, and don’t see the true picture
Documents are stored scattered and unprotected
Papers and documents and scattered, the secureness of data is irrelevant, which increases the risk of data leakage and attacks
Human factor
3rd party professionals are prone to making mistakes, outsourcing teams are unreliable. Your family stays in dependence of that
3rd party interest
Even the professionals are interested in having Parallel data transfer channels, to reduce their legal and financial risks
These risks lead to asset loss, due to lack of data:
Without information, it is impossible to locate and protect your assets